https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2024.603
Perception and attitudes of critical care nurses on external urinary catheter securement and the prevalence of securement devices in critically ill patients
Submitted: 4 September 2024
Accepted: 26 November 2024
Published: 10 December 2024
Accepted: 26 November 2024
Abstract Views: 385
PDF: 87
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Introduction: the literature describes the limited use of urinary catheter securement devices (UC). Critical care nurses (CCNs) consider UC security an important activity for nursing care. Our objective was to determine CCN perceptions and attitudes to external UC security and the prevalence of securement devices in seriously ill patients.
Materials and Methods: a cross-sectional observation study was carried out between the CCNs of southern Italy between May and July 2023. All CCNs with a probationary period of less than six months were excluded. Chi-square tests assessed the correlation between variables. The significance level was set to p> 0.05.
Results: a total of 77.6% (n=76) know UC securement devices, but only 43.9% (n=43) have these devices available in operational units. CCNs with security devices reported reduced urinary tract infections [(89.5 % n=42) compared to (10.6 % n=5), p=0.007] and patient comfort [(83%, n=60) versus (16.7%, n=12), p=0.02] and dislocation [(84.9%, n=62) versus (15.1%, n=11)]. Changes can be reduced according to CCNs with safety devices [56.2% (n=41) versus 43.8% (n=32), p=0.0001].
Conclusions: the results of this study will significantly contribute to incorporating this activity into standard nursing care and improving the quality of care. Future research should consider the potential effects of nursing care.
Zarb P, Coignard B, Griskeviciene J, et al. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) pilot point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use. Eurosurveillance 2012;17:20316.
Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care–associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1198-208.
Dellimore KH, Helyer AR, Franklin SE. A scoping review of important urinary catheter induced complications. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2013;24:1825-35.
Gray ML. Securing the Indwelling Catheter. Am J Nursing 2008;108:44-50.
Dellimore KH, Helyer AR, Franklin SE. A scoping review of important urinary catheter induced complications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2013;24:1825-35.
Tegegne KD, Wagaw GB, Gebeyehu NA, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infections and risk factors among diabetic patients in Ethiopia, a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2023;18:e0278028.
Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health Care–Associated Infections: A Meta-analysis of Costs and Financial Impact on the US Health Care System. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:2039.
Gravante F, Lombardi A, Gagliardi AM, Pucci A, Latina R. Dressings and Securement Devices of Peripheral Arterial Catheters in Intensive Care Units and Operating Theaters: A Systematic Review. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2020;39:242-50.
Siegel TJ. Do Registered Nurses Perceive the Anchoring of Indwelling Urinary Catheters as a Necessary Aspect of Nursing Care? A Pilot Study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006;33:140-4.
Gravante F, Gravante A, Petrosino F, et al. I sistemi di fissaggio esterno del catetere vescicale a permanenza nei pazienti adulti ospedalizzati: una revisione narrativa della letteratura. Scenario 2024;40:564
NHS Trust Leeds community healthcare. Urinary catheter securing device fact sheet (for care providers). Published online May 2018.
Grip-Lok 3400LFC Foley Catheter Securement |Twenty20 Healthcare. Accessed September 3, 2023. Available from: https://www.twenty20hc.com/products/grip-lok-foley-catheter-securement-device.
Tracy C. Comparison of catheter-securing devices. Urol Nurs 2000;20:43-6.
Macneil JW, Wilkins RG, Taylor RP, Lau HM. Does the method of “securing the catheter” make any difference? J Clin Urol 2018;11:21-6.
Darouiche RO, Goetz L, Kaldis T, et al. Impact of StatLock securing device on symptomatic catheter-related urinary tract infection: A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:555-60.
Appah Y, Hunter KF, Moore KN. Securement of the Indwelling Urinary Catheter: A Prevalence Study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2016;43:173-7.
Orme LA, Smith RJ, Berry JC. Development and evaluation of CliniFix®, a catheter/tubing fixation device. Br J Nurs 2008;17:544-9.
Chan RJ, Northfield S, Larsen E, et al. Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:458.
Saokar A, Arellano RS, Gervais DA, et al. Transvaginal drainage of pelvic fluid collections: results, expectations, and experience. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1352-58.
Hamlin JA, Friedman M, Stein MG, Bray JF. Percutaneous biliary drainage: complications of 118 consecutive catheterizations. Radiology 1986;158:199-202.
Donatelli G, Airinei G, Poupardin E, et al. Double-pigtail stent migration invading the spleen: rare potentially fatal complication of endoscopic internal drainage for sleeve gastrectomy leak. Endoscopy 2016;48:E74-5.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, ed. The Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
Fiers S. Indwelling catheters and devices: avoiding the problems. Urol Nurs 1994;14:141-4.
Moore KN, Rayome RG. Problem solving and troubleshooting: the indwelling catheter. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1995;22:242-7.
Newman DK. Managing indwelling urethral catheters. Ostomy Wound Manage 1998;44:26-28, 30, 32 passim.
Aziz F, Abd Rahman MJ. Digitalized management approach and perceived digital fluency and administrative competencies among primary teachers. IJARBSS 2023;13:1988-2009.
Mcneill SA, Hargreave TB. Members of the Alfaur Study Group. Alfuzosin once daily facilitates return to voiding in patients in acute urinary retention. J Urol 2004;171:2316-20.
How to Cite
Fioratti, L., Limonti, F., Esposito, P., Vaia, R., Gionti, L., Marino, G., & Gravante, F. (2024). Perception and attitudes of critical care nurses on external urinary catheter securement and the prevalence of securement devices in critically ill patients. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2024.603
Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Aniarti has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Donato Longo, Nicola Ramacciati, Tools for evaluating evidence-based practice among nursing students: a narrative review , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 38 No. 1 (2021): SCENARIO 1 2021
- Gian Domenico Giusti, Nurses and politics , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 39 No. 3 (2022): SCENARIO 3 2022
- Maria Benetton, Assessment of death according to the cardiocirculatory criterion and controlled donation: ethical and legal aspects. The opinion of the National Bioethics Committee , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 39 No. 2 (2022): SCENARIO 2 2022
- Maurizio Beretta, Massimo Guasconi, Alberto Veneziani, Luciana Branchini, Enrico Lucenti, Non-invasive ventilation devices in pre-hospital emergency care , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 38 No. 1 (2021): SCENARIO 1 2021
- Natalino Palermo, Francesco Limonti, Angelica Semeraro, Daniele Ermanno, Miguel Angel Paludi, Nicola Ramacciati, The impact of COVID-19 on change management: a narrative review , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 40 No. 3 (2023)
- July Colacito, Marialuisa Buffon, Ethical dilemmas for health professionals during pandemics: a literature review , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 38 No. 1 (2021): SCENARIO 1 2021
- Gennaro Laus, A robotic system for chemotherapy preparations: A literature review , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 40 No. 2 (2023)
- Beatrice Persiani, Cecilia Cesari, Viola Tini, Stefano Trapassi, Moris Rosati, Francesco D’Ambrosio, Lorenzo Righi, Tools for assessing the risk of violence in the emergency room: a narrative review of the literature , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 40 No. 2 (2023)
- Valerio Di Nardo, Giulia Caroli, Andrea Del Grande, Leonardo Di Nardo, To what extent the implementation of the See-and-Treat model could it contribute to the management of emergency room overcrowding? A retrospective descriptive study , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 40 No. 2 (2023)
- Luigi Luca Izzo, Stefano Trapassi, Lorenzo Righi, Intranasal drug administration in the out-of-hospital setting: a narrative review of the literature , Scenario® - Il Nursing nella sopravvivenza: Vol. 39 No. 2 (2022): SCENARIO 2 2022
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.