Editorial(s)

Quality management, clinical risk, and accreditation: the role of scientific societies and the specialist nurse

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 19 December 2025
20
Views
17
Downloads

Authors

Quality and patient safety currently represent the foundation of the effectiveness of healthcare systems and constitute an indispensable strategic pillar for all healthcare organizations. They are key indicators of the ability to respond to population health needs in an appropriate, safe, and sustainable manner. Within this context, clinical governance emerges as the conceptual framework that integrates clinical accountability, performance evaluation, risk management, continuing professional development, and active engagement of healthcare professionals. It is not merely an organizational model, but rather a cultural approach that requires methodological rigor, advanced competencies, and a systemic vision capable of overcoming the fragmentation of care processes.

Within the clinical governance framework, clinical risk management plays a central role. It enables structured analysis of care processes, identification of critical issues, assessment of adverse events and near misses, and the implementation of measurable and evidence-based improvement actions. The Italian regulatory framework has progressively consolidated this approach: Law No. 24/2017 recognized patient safety as an integral component of the right to health and as a shared responsibility between professionals and healthcare organizations, while Legislative Decree No. 502/1992 and Ministerial Decree No. 70/2015 established quality-, transparency-, and appropriateness-oriented standards and accreditation requirements. [...]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Agenas. Modelli di accreditamento e qualità nei servizi sanitari. Roma; 2019.
Agenas. Requisiti di accreditamento istituzionale delle strutture sanitarie. Roma; 2021.
Accordo Stato–Regioni. Linee di indirizzo per la sicurezza del paziente e la gestione del rischio clinico. 20 marzo 2008.
Accordo Stato–Regioni. Profili professionali e sviluppo delle competenze nelle professioni sanitarie. 10 luglio 2014.
ANIARTI. Linee di indirizzo per l’assistenza infermieristica in area critica. Firenze; varie edizioni.
ANIARTI. Documenti e raccomandazioni per la sicurezza in area critica. Firenze; 2018-2023. ASIQuAS. Linee di indirizzo per la qualità dell’assistenza e il miglioramento continuo. Roma; 2018.
ASIQuAS. Manuale di Clinical Governance e sicurezza delle cure. Roma; 2020.
D.Lgs. 502/1992. Riordino della disciplina in materia sanitaria.
DM 70/2015. Regolamento sugli standard qualitativi, strutturali e tecnologici dell’assistenza ospedaliera.
Legge 43/2006. Disposizioni in materia di professioni sanitarie e funzioni specialistiche.
Legge 24/2017. Disposizioni in materia di sicurezza delle cure e responsabilità professionale.
FNOPI. Linee di indirizzo per l’infermiere specialista. Roma; 2021.
Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Health Administration Press; 1980.
Joint Commission International. Accreditation Standards for Hospitals. 7ª ed.; 2021.
Ministero della Salute. Manuale per la gestione del rischio clinico. Roma; 2015.
Ministero della Salute. Piano Nazionale per la Sicurezza del Paziente 2020–2022. Roma; 2020.
Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ; 2000.
World Health Organization. Patient Safety: Global Action Plan 2021–2030. Geneva; 2021.

How to Cite



Quality management, clinical risk, and accreditation: the role of scientific societies and the specialist nurse. (2025). Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2025.669