Original Articles

After the uproar: an experimental investigation on debriefing among intensive care nurses

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 8 June 2026
5
Views
3
Downloads

Authors

Introduction: intensive care nurses face high levels of stress, which can affect their emotional well-being. Debriefing is a useful tool to process experiences, reduce stress, and improve team effectiveness, ultimately benefiting patients and their families. The DASH (Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare) is one of the most widely used tools to assess the quality and impact of debriefing, both in real clinical settings and simulations. This study analyzes its effectiveness in supporting nurses after critical events.

Materials and Methods: the study, conducted at “San Camillo-Forlanini” Hospital in Rome, assessed the perception of debriefing among intensive care nurses using an adapted Italian version of the DASH questionnaire. The sample, composed exclusively of nurses, was selected due to their frequent exposure to high-stress situations. The questionnaires, distributed in June 2024 in paper format, were completed within 60 days. Anonymity and privacy were ensured.

Results: the DASH analysis highlights strengths and critical issues. The organization of the debriefing is positively evaluated, as is the maintenance of an engaging learning environment. However, difficulties emerge in encouraging peer exchange and recognizing team emotions. To improve debriefing effectiveness, adequate training, structured guidelines, and the promotion of in-depth discussions are essential. Effective feedback and constant monitoring can help reduce stress and burnout.

Conclusions: debriefing is essential for nurses’ well-being and the quality of care. To enhance its effectiveness, it is necessary to invest in training and in structuring the process, thus ensuring a safer work environment and better emotional support for staff.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Ballangrud R, Hall-Lord ML, Persenius M, Hedelin B. Intensive care nurses’ perceptions of simulation-based team training for building patient safety in intensive care: A descriptive qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2014;30:179–87.
2. Berchtenbreiter K, Innes K, Watterson J, et al. Intensive care unit nurses’ perceptions of debriefing after critical incidents: A qualitative descriptive study. Aust Crit Care 2024;37:288–94.
3. Jarden RJ, Sandham M, Siegert RJ, Koziol-McLain J. Strengthening workplace well-being: Perceptions of intensive care nurses. Nurs Crit Care 2019;24:15–23.
4. Taylor IHF, Dihle A, Hofsø K, Steindal SA. Intensive care nurses’ experiences of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care patients: A qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2020;56:102768.
5. Sandhu G, Colon J, Barlow D, Ferris D. Daily Informal Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit Operational Debriefing Provides Effective Support for Intensive Care Unit Nurses. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2016;35:175–80.
6. Roncallo HR, Ray JM, Kulacz RC, et al. An interprofessional simulation-based orientation program for transitioning novice nurses to critical care roles in the emergency department: pilot implementation and evaluation. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020;46:640–9.
7. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc 2012;7:288–94.
8. Olvera-Cortés HE, Hernández-Gutiérrez LS, Scherer-Castanedo E, et al. Who can debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare? Different perspectives on teledebriefing assessments. Simul Healthc 2022;17:308–12.
9. Tanoubi I, Labben I, Guédira S, et al. The impact of a high fidelity simulation-based debriefing course on the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH)© score of novice instructors. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2019;7:159–64.
10. Hunter LA. Debriefing and feedback in the current healthcare environment. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2016;30:174–8.
11. Gabriel PM, Smith K, Mullen-Fortino M, et al. Systematic debriefing for critical events facilitates team dynamics, education, and process improvement. J Nurs Care Qual 2022;37:142–8.
12. Olsson A, Sjöberg F, Salzmann-Erikson M. Follow the protocol and kickstart the heart—Intensive care nurses’ reflections on being part of rescue situations in interdisciplinary teams. Nurs Open 2021;8:3325–33.
13. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186–91.

How to Cite



After the uproar: an experimental investigation on debriefing among intensive care nurses. (2026). Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2026.634