Comunicazione/ Breve report di ricerca

Gestione e benessere dei pazienti nelle unità di terapia intensiva e nei reparti di oncologia sotto la guida di infermieri specializzati in accesso vascolare: una breve relazione

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Pubblicato: 16 giugno 2026
6
Visite
4
Downloads

Autori

Introduzione: la valutazione dello stato di salute dei vasi sanguigni riveste un ruolo centrale nel miglioramento dei percorsi di cura generali. Per garantire una valutazione efficace e una gestione adeguata, la presenza di un team dedicato agli accessi vascolari (VAT) è fondamentale, specialmente nelle unità di terapia intensiva e nei reparti di oncologia. L’obiettivo di questo studio longitudinale era quello di indagare l’incidenza delle complicanze associate alla gestione dei PICC da parte del VAT in due contesti sanitari dell’Italia centrale. Sono stati osservati in totale 78 pazienti nell’arco di tre mesi.

Risultati: il campione era prevalentemente di sesso maschile (55,1%), aveva un’età media di 79 anni (SD=16,43) ed era stato sottoposto all’impianto di PICC. La chemioterapia (38,5%) e gli antibiotici (28,2%) sono stati i tipi di farmaci più prevalenti somministrati attraverso questo dispositivo.

Discussione: al follow-up di tre mesi, le complicanze registrate includevano infezioni del sangue correlate al catetere (0,71 per 1.000 giorni-catetere) e trombosi venosa (0,28 per 1.000 giorni-catetere).

Conclusioni: la gestione dei PICC da parte di un VAT infermieristico è risultata associata a bassi tassi di complicanze a tre mesi. Protocolli strutturati, formazione del personale e monitoraggio degli esiti possono migliorare la sicurezza del paziente in terapia intensiva e oncologia.

Downloads

La data di download non è ancora disponibile.

Citations

1. Fiorini J, Venturini G, Conti F, et al. Vessel health and preservation: An integrative review. J Clin Nurs 2019;28:1039-49.
2. Gorski LA. Update: the 2024 infusion therapy standards of practice. Home Healthc Now 2024;42:198-205.
3. Bertoglio S, Faccini B, Lalli L, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: A prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures. J Surg Oncol 2016;113:708-14.
4. Chopra V, Ratz D, Kuhn L, et al. PICC-associated bloodstream infections: prevalence, patterns, and predictors. Am J Med 2014;127:319-28.
5. Lacostena-Pérez ME, Buesa-Escar AM, Gil-Alós AM. Complications related to the insertion and maintenance of peripheral venous access central venous catheter. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed) 2019;30:116-26. English, Spanish.
6. Raza H, Hashmi MN, Dianne V, et al. Vascular access outcome with a dedicated vascular team based approach. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2019;30:39-44.
7. Corcuera Martínez MI, Aldonza Torres M, Díez Revilla AM, et al. Impact assessment following implementation of a vascular access team. J Vasc Access 2022;23:135-44.
8. Golden S, Weaver J, Russell E, et al. Educational value of an intern-directed vascular access team at a community teaching hospital. Am Surg 2022;88:1159-62.
9. Fernandez-Fernandez I, Parra-García G, Blanco-Mavillard I, et al. Vascular access specialist teams versus standard practice for catheter insertion and prevention of failure: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2024;14:e082631.
10. Ricou Ríos L, Esposito Català C, Pons Calsapeu A, et al. Implementation of a vascular access specialist team in a tertiary hospital: a cost-benefit analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2023;21:67.
11. Duwadi S, Zhao Q, Budal BS. Peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients - complications and its prevention: A review. Int J Nurs Sci 2018;6:99-105.
12. Carr PJ, Higgins NS, Cooke ML, et al. Vascular access specialist teams for device insertion and prevention of failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3:CD011429.
13. Brescia F, Pittiruti M, Spencer TR, Dawson RB. The SIP protocol update: Eight strategies, incorporating Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment (RaPeVA), to minimize complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheter insertion. J Vasc Access 2024;25:5-13.
14. Nickel B, Gorski L, Kleidon T, et al. Infusion therapy standards of practice, 9th edition. J Infus Nurs 2024;47:S1-S285.
15. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e162-93.
16. Chopra V, Anand S, Krein SL, et al. Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Med 2012;125:733-41.
17. Larcher R, Barrigah-Benissan K, Ory J, et al. Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (PICC) related bloodstream infection in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy compared with noncancer patients: a propensity-score-matched analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:3253.
18. Haddad A, Wilson Dib R, Chaftari AM, et al. Risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections in a high-risk cancer patient population. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2025;46:1-4.
19. Lafuente Cabrero E, Terradas Robledo R, Civit Cuñado A, et al. Risk factors of catheter- associated bloodstream infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023;18:e0282290.
20. González S, Jiménez P, Saavedra P, et al. Five-year outcome of peripherally inserted central catheters in adults: a separated infectious and thrombotic complications analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:833-41.
21. Qiu XX, Guo Y, Fan HB, et al. Incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter spontaneous dislodgment in oncology patients: a prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:955-63.
22. Liem TK, Yanit KE, Moseley SE, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter usage patterns and associated symptomatic upper extremity venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:761-7.
23. Zerla PA, Canelli A, Cerne L, et al. Evaluating safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of PICC securement by subcutaneously anchored stabilization device. J Vasc Access 2017;18:238-42.
24. Quinn M, Horowitz JK, Krein SL, et al. The role of hospital-based vascular access teams and implications for patient safety: A multi-methods study. J Hosp Med 2024;19:13-23.
25. Li J, Hu Z, Luo M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters versus conventional PICC in adult cancer patients. Eur Radiol 2024;34:7776–85.
26. Hong J, Mao X. Complications of tunneled and non-tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Front Surg 2024;11:1469847.

Come citare



Gestione e benessere dei pazienti nelle unità di terapia intensiva e nei reparti di oncologia sotto la guida di infermieri specializzati in accesso vascolare: una breve relazione. (2026). Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2026.651