Articoli originali
V. 43 N. 1 (2026)
The La prevenzione delle infezioni catetere venoso centrale correlate: uno studio osservazionale in terapia intensiva
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Pubblicato: 26 febbraio 2026
9
Visite
5
Downloads
Autori
Introduzione: le infezioni del flusso sanguigno correlate al Catetere Venoso Centrale (CVC) sono tra le infezioni più frequenti acquisite in ospedale, e sono associate a una mortalità significativamente aumentata. Obiettivo del presente studio è descrivere le conoscenze sulle raccomandazioni per la prevenzione delle infezioni CVC in Terapia Intensiva pre-post intervento formativo e la loro applicazione.
Materiali e Metodi: è stato condotto uno studio pre-post formazione che ha coinvolto infermieri e medici della Terapia Intensiva. Le conoscenze sono state misurate con un questionario ad hoc e la loro applicazione tramite osservazioni sul campo con apposita check list.
Risultati: sono stati inclusi 36 infermieri e 10 medici. Il 78,2% del personale indossa monili. La gestione delle medicazioni è conforme nel 100% dei casi, ma l’igiene delle mani solo nell’ 81,3%. Solo in parte si è avuto un incremento delle conoscenze e non sempre le buone pratiche sono applicate.
Conclusioni: la formazione contribuisce a migliorare le conoscenze ma la loro applicazione non sempre risulta conforme. La formazione risulta quindi necessaria, ma utilizzando strategie diverse come simulazioni e centrandola sugli aspetti più critici. La check list, potrebbe essere adottata per il monitoraggio nel tempo e per delle indagini di prevalenza.
Downloads
La data di download non è ancora disponibile.
Citations
1. Chaves F, Garnacho-Montero J, Del Pozo JL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection: Clinical guidelines of the spanish society of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology and (SEIMC) and the spanish society of spanish society of intensive and critical care medicine and coronary units (SEMICYUC). Med Intensiva 2018;42:5–36
2. Ziegler MJ, Pellegrini DC, Safdar N. Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection 2015;43:29-36.
3. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention of bloodstream infections and other infections associated with the use of intravascular catheters. Part I: Peripheral intravascular catheters. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Disponibile presso: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093829
4. Timsit JF, Bouadma L, Ruckly S, et. al. Dressing disruption is a major risk factor for catheter-related infections. Crit Care Med 2012;40:1707–1714.
5. Mimoz O, Lucet JC, Kerforne T, et. al. Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicenter, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial. Lancet 2015;386:2069–77.
6. Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G, (a cura di). Raccomandazioni GAVeCeLT 2024 per la indicazione, l’impianto e la gestione dei dispositivi per accesso venoso. Disponibile presso: https://gavecelt.it/nuovo/sites/default/files/uploads/raccomandazioni-gavecelt-2024.pdf
7. Buetti N, Marschall J, Drees M, et al. Strategies to prevent central line-associated blood-stream infections in acute care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:553-69.
8. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:1–45.
9. Burnham JP, Rojek RP, Kollef MH. Catheter removal and outcomes of multidrug-resistant central-line-associated bloodstream infection. Medicine 2018;97:e12782.
10. Laupland KB, Koulenti D, Schwebel C. The CVC and CRBSI: don't use it and lose it!. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:238–40.
11. Van der Kooi T, Sax H, Pittet D, et. al. Prevention of hospital infections by intervention and training (PROHIBIT): results of a pan-European cluster-randomized multicentre study to reduce central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:48–60.
12. Rupp ME, Karnatak R. Intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2018;32:765–87.
13. Lai NM, Lai NA, O'Riordan E, et al. Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;7:CD010140.
14. Wassil SK, Crill CM, Phelps SJ. Antimicrobial impregnated catheters in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2007;12:77-90.
15. Porritt K. Central venous access device (cvad): insertion. JBI Database 2021.
16. Parienti JJ, du Cheyron D, Timsit JF, et. al. Meta-analysis of subclavian insertion and no tunneled central venous catheter-associated infection risk reduction in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2012;40:1627–1634.
17. Parienti JJ. Catheter-related bloodstream infection in jugular versus subclavian central catheterization. Crit Care Med 2017;45:e734–5.
18. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, et. al. Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Eng Med 2015;373:1220–9.
19. Timsit JF, Bouadma L, Mimoz O, et. al. Jugular versus femoral short-term catheterization and risk of infection in intensive care unit patients. Causal analysis of two randomized trials. Am Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:1232–9.
20. Cosme V, Massart N, Reizine F, et. al. Central venous catheter-related infection: does insertion site still matter? A French multicentric cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2024;50:1830–40.
21. O’Grady NP. Prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infections. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1121-31
22. Jarding EK, Flynn Makic MB. central line care and management: adopting evidence-based nursing interventions. J Perianesth Nurs 2021;36:328–33.
23. Casey AL, Badia JM, Higgins A, et. al. Skin antisepsis: it's not only what you use, it's the way that you use it. J Hosp Infect 2017;96:221–2.
24. Timsit JF, Rupp M, Bouza E, et. al. A state of the art review on optimal practices to prevent, recognize, and manage complications associated with intravascular devices in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:742–59.
25. Shi Y, Yang N, Zhang L, et al. Chlorhexidine disinfectant can reduce the risk of central venous catheter infection compared with povidone: a meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:1255-62.
26. Zhang Y, Li H, Wang J, et al. Chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2025;15:92476.
27. Karpanen TJ, Casey AL, Whitehouse T, et. al. A clinical evaluation of two central venous catheter stabilization systems. Ann Intensive Care 2019;9:49.
28. Timsit JF, Schwebel C, Bouadma L, et. al. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009;301:1231–41.
29. Puig-Asensio M, Marra AR, Childs CA, et. al. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections. Does one size fit all? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:1388–95.
30. Azzopardi A, Trapani J. Chlorhexidine-based versus non-chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections: An evidence-based review. Nurs Crit Care 2024;29:191–5.
31. Centers for Disease Control [CDC] Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections (2011). APPENDIX 1: Search Strategy and Evidence Summary Supporting the 2017 Updated Recommendations on the Use of Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Dressings for Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections. Disponibile presso: https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/c-i-dressings/index.html
32. Ullman AJ, Cooke ML, Gillies D, et al. Optimal timing for intravascular administration set replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;9:CD003588.
33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections. Georgia: Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. 2011.update 2017. Disponibile presso: https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-H.pdf
34. Chi X, Guo J, Niu X, et al. Prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections: a survey of ICU nurses’ knowledge and practice in China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020;9:186.
35. Alqalah TAH. Mitigating risks in central line-associated bloodstream infection: A comprehensive insight into critical care nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and compliance. BMC Nurs 2024;23:497–509.
36. Kaya H, Yilmaz F, Demir S. Knowledge and attitudes of intensive care unit nurses towards evidence-based practices for preventing catheter-related infections: a descriptive study. BMC Nurs 2025;24:3236.
37. Patel PK, Gupta A, Vaughn VM, et al. Review of strategies to reduce central line-associated bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) and catheter‐associated urinary tract Infection (CAUTI) in adult ICUs. J Hosp Med 2018;13:105–16.
38. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:573-77.
39. Smith R, Johnson L, Clarke P, et al. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of peripheral intravenous catheter dressings and securement devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Wound Manag 2025;26:8.
40. Gavin NC, Webster J, Chan RJ, Rickard CM. Frequency of dressing changes for central venous access devices on catheter-related infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD009213.
41. Bati B, Ozyurek P. Knowledge levels of intensive care unit nurses on central venous catheters. J Crit Intensive Care 2015;6:34–8.
42. Al Qadire M, Hani AM. Nurses’ and physicians’ knowledge of guidelines for preventing catheter-related blood stream infections. Nurs Crit Care 2020;27:594–601.
43. Badparva B, Ghanbari A, Karkhah S, et al. Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections: ICU nurses’ knowledge and barriers. Nurs Crit Care 2023;28:419–2
44. Yin Y, Tang C, Zhang L, et. al. Establishment and implementation of a nurse-led interdisciplinary management strategy for central line maintenance: A single-center experience. Int J Nurs Sci 2023;10:345-50.
Come citare
The La prevenzione delle infezioni catetere venoso centrale correlate: uno studio osservazionale in terapia intensiva. (2026). Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2026.647
Copyright (c) 2026 Gli Autori
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.