Articoli originali

Conoscenze, competenze e formazione degli infermieri del soccorso pre-ospedaliero sulle filosofie del trasporto: una survey

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Pubblicato: 21 maggio 2026
0
Visite
0
Downloads

Autori

Introduzione: sul territorio nazionale italiano si riconoscono diverse metodologie di soccorso extraospedaliero, allo scopo di migliorare l'assistenza e il trasporto di pazienti con malattie o lesioni critiche sensibili al fattore tempo. L’obiettivo di questo studio è indagare le conoscenze, la formazione e le competenze autoriferite degli infermieri impiegati nell’ambito dell’Emergenza Sanitaria preospedaliera sul territorio italiano, in riferimento alle diverse modalità di gestione di soccorso e trasporto.

Materiali e Metodi: è stata condotta un’indagine osservazionale multicentrica tramite una Web-Survey somministrata a infermieri italiani operanti nel soccorso preospedaliero È stata condotta un’analisi descrittiva mediante frequenze, percentuali, media e deviazione standard, e un’analisi inferenziale mediante correlazioni non parametriche di Spearman (IBM-SPSS ver. 26).

Risultati: un campione di 208 infermieri ha aderito alla survey. Il 96% degli infermieri ha dichiarato di conoscere le modalità scoop and run e stay and play, ma il 77% degli infermieri non le attuerebbe nel trauma e/o in una situazione di shock. Le conoscenze e competenze degli infermieri del soccorso preospedaliero sullo shock e sulle modalità di trasporto risultano carenti, nonostante più del 70% degli infermieri abbia svolto corsi di formazione relativi a trauma, shock e sulle modalità di trasporto.

Conclusioni: la survey evidenzia lacune conoscitive e applicative sulle strategie di trasporto nel trauma/shock, nonostante l’ampia esposizione formativa dichiarata. Le differenze per area geografica ed esperienza si inseriscono in un sistema 118 strutturalmente eterogeneo, con modelli organizzativi e standard formativi non uniformi. I risultati supportano la necessità di percorsi formativi continuativi e di criteri minimi condivisi per competenze e pratiche nel soccorso preospedaliero.

 

Downloads

La data di download non è ancora disponibile.

Citations

1. Mehmood A, Rowther AA, Kobusingye O, Hyder AA. Assessment of pre-hospital emergency medical services in low-income settings using a health systems approach. Int J Emerg Med 2018:11:53.
2. Spoelder EJ, Slagt C, Scheffer GJ, van Geffen GJ. Transport of the patient with trauma: a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2022;77:1281-7.
3. Lidal IB, Holte HH, Vist GE. Triage systems for pre-hospital emergency medical services - a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013;21:28.
4. Dijkink S, Nederpelt CJ, Krijnen P, et al. Trauma systems around the world: A systematic overview. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017;83:917-25.
5. Doucet J, Bulger E, Sanddal N, et al. Appropriate use of helicopter emergency medical services for transport of trauma patients: guidelines from the Emergency Medical System Subcommittee, Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;75:734-41.
6. Smith RM, Conn AK. Prehospital care - scoop and run or stay and play? Injury 2009;40:S23-26.
7. Chen CH, Shin SD, Sun JT, et al. Association between prehospital time and outcome of trauma patients in 4 Asian countries: A cross-national, multicenter cohort study. PLoS Med 2020;17:e1003360.
8. Gristina G, Pulice E. Il sistema sanitario di emergenza italiano tra prove e rischi di corporativismo: il “caso Bologna”. Parte I: le prove / Parte II: deontologia e diritto. Recenti Prog Med 2019;110:168-87.
9. Van den Brande Ruben FR, Synnot A. Stay and play vs. scoop and run in trauma care: a systematic review. Int J Care Scholars 2014;5:79-94.
10. Nirula R, Maier R, Moore E, et al. Scoop and run to the trauma center or stay and play at the local hospital: hospital transfer's effect on mortality. J Trauma 2010;69:595-9; discussion 599-601.
11. Verdonck P, Peters M, Stroobants T, et al. Effects of major trauma care organisation on mortality in a European level 1 trauma centre: A retrospective analysis of 2016-2023. Injury 2024;55:112022.
12. Penn J, McAleer R, Ziegler C, et al. Effectiveness of prehospital critical care scene response for major trauma: a systematic review. Prehosp Emerg Care 2026;30:309-22.
13. Dinh M, Singh H, Deans C, et al. Prehospital times and outcomes of patients transported using an ambulance trauma transport protocol: A data linkage analysis from New South Wales Australia. Injury 2023;54:110988.
14. Burns B, Hsu HR, Keech A, et al. Expedited transport versus continued on-scene resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resusc Plus 2023;16:100482.
15. Pham H, Puckett Y, Dissanaike S. Faster on-scene times associated with decreased mortality in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) transported trauma patients. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2017;2:e000122.
16. Ahmed Eid SH, Taha NM, Zatton HK. Nurses’ knowledge and practice of trauma patients during golden hours of care. Zagazig Nurs J 201713:244-57.
17. Clements R, Mackenzie R. Competence in prehospital care: evolving concepts. Emerg Med J 2005;22:516-9.
18. Nandasena G, Abeysena C. Knowledge, attitudes and skills of doctors, nurses and emergency medical technicians in pre-hospital care and emergency medicine who accompany patients in ambulances which arrive at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Int J Clin Anesth Res 2018;2:38-43.
19. Jansson J. Prehospital nurses’ professional competence–utilization and development. Karlstads universitet, 2023.
20. Shrestha B, Dunn L. The Declaration of Helsinki on Medical Research involving Human Subjects: A Review of Seventh Revision. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2020;17:548-52.
21. Rowe JA. Accountability: a fundamental component of nursing practice. Br J Nurs 2000;9:549-52.
22. Hall A. Defining nursing knowledge. Nurs Times 2005;101:34-7.
23. Elias CE, Day T. Experiences of newly qualified nurses in critical care: a qualitative systematic review. J Intensive Care Soc 2020;21:334-43.
24. Celik S, Tasdemir N, Kurt A, et al. Fatigue in intensive care nurses and related factors. Int J Occup Environ Med 2017;8:199-206.
25. Alharbi RJ, Shrestha S, Lewis V, Miller C. The effectiveness of trauma care systems at different stages of development in reducing mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg 2021;16:38.
26. Taran S. The scoop and run method of pre-clinical care for trauma victims. Mcgill J Med 2009;12:73.
27. Greenspan L, McLellan BA, Greig H. Abbreviated injury scale and injury severity score: a scoring chart. J Trauma 1985;25:60-4.
28. Hussmann B, Lendemans S. Pre-hospital and early in-hospital management of severe injuries: changes and trends. Injury 2014;45:S39-42.
29. Ramesh GH, Uma JC, Farhath S. Fluid resuscitation in trauma: what are the best strategies and fluids? Int J Emerg Med 2019;12:38.
30. Nishi K, Takasu A, Shinozaki H, et al. Hemodilution as a result of aggressive fluid resuscitation aggravates coagulopathy in a rat model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:808-12.
31. Geeraedts LM Jr, Pothof LA, Caldwell E, et al. Prehospital fluid resuscitation in hypotensive trauma patients: do we need a tailored approach? Injury 2015;46:4-9.
32. Haut ER, Kalish BT, Cotton BA, et al. Prehospital intravenous fluid administration is associated with higher mortality in trauma patients: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis. Ann Surg 2011;253:371-7.
33. Wallace HA, Regunath H. Fluid Resuscitation. In StatPearls; Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Hariharan Regunath declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies., 2025.
34. McMullan J, Curry BW, Calhoun D, et al. Prehospital trauma compendium: fluid resuscitation in trauma - a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP. Prehosp Emerg Care 2024, 1-11, doi:10.1080/10903127.2024.2433146.
35. Ziu E, Mesfin FB, Evans KA. Spinal Shock (Nursing). In StatPearls; Treasure Island (FL), 2023.
36. Almomani MH, Khater WA, Qasem BAA, Joseph RA. Nurses' knowledge and practices of physical restraints in intensive care units: An observational study. Nurs Open 2021;8:262-72.
37. Brigolini G, Ciconet RM. Restricted movement of the spine: an analysis of the knowledge of nursing professionals. Cogitare Enfermagem 2023;28:e87844.
38. Tartaglione M, Carenzo L, Gamberini L, et al. Multicentre observational study on practice of prehospital management of hypotensive trauma patients: the SPITFIRE study protocol. BMJ Open 2022;12:e062097.
39. Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Adams PW. Prehospital plasma during air medical transport in trauma patients. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1783.
40. Romanelli D, Farrell MW. AVPU Score. In StatPearls; Treasure Island (FL), 2023.
41. Janagama SR, Newberry JA, Kohn MA, et al. Is AVPU comparable to GCS in critical prehospital decisions? - A cross-sectional study. Am J Emerg Med 2022;59:106-10.
42. Beuran M, Paun S, Gaspar B, et al. Prehospital trauma care: a clinical review. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2012;107:564-70.

Come citare



Conoscenze, competenze e formazione degli infermieri del soccorso pre-ospedaliero sulle filosofie del trasporto: una survey. (2026). Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2026.630