Use of intraosseous access in clinically deteriorated patients admitted in general wards: a scoping review protocol

Submitted: 6 December 2024
Accepted: 9 March 2025
Published: 9 June 2025
Abstract Views: 270
PDF: 93
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Introduction: Intraosseous (IO) access is a non-collapsible vascular access technique primarily used in emergency and urgent care settings. However, its utilisation and potential usefulness in general hospital wards remain unclear. The aim of this scoping review protocol is to map the available evidence on the use of IO access in hospitalised patients experiencing sudden clinical deterioration. The aim is to investigate what evidence is available on intraosseous access in patients with clinical deterioration admitted to ordinary wards. Materials and Methods: the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Open Dissertations, and CENTRAL will be searched. The review will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies, literature reviews, grey literature, as well as guidelines and recommendations from scientific societies. The review will be conducted following JBI guidelines, and the selection process will be illustrated using the PRISMA flow diagram. The findings will be presented descriptively, incorporating graphs and figures where appropriate, in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Conclusions: this scoping review may identify gaps in the existing literature and contribute to defining future research directions.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Ramel E, Schmutz T, Deglise A, et al. [Alternatives to the intravenous route in emergency situations]. Rev Med Suisse 2024;20:1961–4.
2. Fowler R, Gallagher JV, Isaacs SM, et al. The role of intraosseous vascular access in the out-of-hospital environment (resource document to NAEMSP position statement). Prehosp Emerg Care 2007;11:63–6.
3. Wang D, Deng L, Zhang R, et al. Efficacy of intraosseous access for trauma resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg WJES 2023;18:17.
4. Hallas P. Challenges in the use of intraosseous access. Indian J Med Res 2016;143:261–3.
5. Rosenberg H, Cheung WJ. Intraosseous access. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can 2013;185:E238.
6. Metter RB, Rittenberger JC, Guyette FX, Callaway CW. Association between intraosseous vascular access and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013;84:49-57.
7. Gerritse BM, Scheffer GJ, Draaisma JMTh. Prehospital intraosseus access with the bone injection gun by a helicopter-transported emergency medical team. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2009;66:1739–41.
8. Paxton JH. Intraosseous vascular access: A review. Trauma 2012;14:195–232.
9. Petitpas F, Guenezan J, Vendeuvre T, Set al. Use of intra-osseous access in adults: a systematic review. Crit Care Lond Engl 2016;20:102.
10. Olaussen A, Williams B. Intraosseous access in the prehospital setting: literature review. Prehospital Disaster Med 2012;27:468–72.
11. Leidel BA, Kirchhoff C, Bogner V, et al. Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins. Resuscitation 2012;83:40–5.
12. Zhang J, Ren Y, Han X, et al. Systematic overview of intraosseous access versus intravenous delivery for emergency resuscitation: Efficacy and quality of existing evidence. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103:e38371.
13. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19–32.
14. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al., eds. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024. 10. Scoping reviews - JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis - JBI Global Wiki. [citato 14 settembre 2024]. Disponibile su: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355862497/10.+Scoping+reviews
15. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2020;18:2119-26.
16. Tricco, AC, Lillie, E, Zarin, W, S et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018,169:467-73.
17. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210.
18. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
19. Pollock D, Davies EL, Peters MDJ, et al. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. J Adv Nurs 2021;77:2102-13.
20. Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2023;21:520-32.

How to Cite

Montesanto, N., Caldarera, E., Lucenti, E., Bassi, M. C., Bonasera Vincenti , N., Gambolò, L., … Guasconi, M. (2025). Use of intraosseous access in clinically deteriorated patients admitted in general wards: a scoping review protocol. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2025.617