https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2019.384
Etica della ricerca in condizioni di urgenza. Domande etiche sulle conclusioni dello studio PARAMEDIC2.
Ricevuto: 7 agosto 2019
Accettato: 7 agosto 2019
Pubblicato: 7 agosto 2019
Accettato: 7 agosto 2019
Abstract Views: 509
PDF: 29
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Introduzione: Nel luglio 2018 un articolo apparso sul The New England Journal of Medicine riportante i risultati dello studio PARA- MEDIC2 ha destato molto scalpore. Si è trattato di uno studio randomizzato controllato su un campione di circa 8000 arruolati, che voleva dimostrare efficacia e sicurezza dell’adrenalina nel trattamento dell’arresto cardiocircolatorio extraospedaliero. Per compierlo, si è reso necessario confrontare l’esito dell’uso dell’adrenalina con placebo (soluzione fisiologica 0.9%).
• Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al. Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(8):711-721
• Loomba RS, Nijhawan K, Aggarwal S, Arora RR. Increased return of spontaneous circulation at the expense of neurologic outcomes: is prehospital epinephrine for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest really worth it? J Crit Care 2015; 30: 1376- 81
• Kleinman ME, Perkins GD, Bhanji F, et al. ILCOR scientific knowledge gaps and clinical research priorities for
cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a consensus statement. Resuscitation 2018; 127: 132-46.
• Soar J, Callaway CW, Aibiki M, et al. Advanced life support: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 2015; 95: e71-e120.
• PARLAMENTO EUROPEO [online] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2012-0266+0+DOC+XML+V0//IT(ultimo accesso 14/06/2012)
• Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018; 137(12): e67-e492.
• IRC (ITALIAN RESUSCITATION COUNCIL). ADRENALINA SI O NO? Finalmente pubblicato lo studio Paramedic2. Ecco una breve descrizione dei risultati. [online] https://www.ircouncil.it/per-sanitari/adrenalina-si-no/(ultimo accesso 06/08/2018)
• World Medical Association, Helsinki Declaration, 28 ottobre 2013, Traduzione italiana a cura di Gimbe, Evidence 2013;5(10): e1000059 [online] http://www.evidence.it/articolodettaglio/209/it/410/dichiarazione-di-helsinki-della-world-medical-association/articolo (ultimo accesso 28/10/2013)
• WARWICK UNIVERSITY,Trial Resources for PARAMEDIC2 trial (The Adrenaline Trial). [online] https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/critical/paramedic2/documents/paramedic2_protocol_v3_12-oct-2016.pdf (12/10/2016)
• IRC (ITALIAN RESUSCITATION COUNCIL). Linee guida ERC 2010 sulla rianimazione cardiopolmonare (RCP) – Sintesi operativa a cura di Italian Resuscitation Council 2010
IRC (ITALIAN RESUSCITATION COUNCIL). Linee guida ERC 2015 – Riassunto dei principali cambiamentI. 2015
• Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 8: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support circulation.2010;122:S729-67.
• (COE) (COUNCIL OF EUROPE). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Reference ETS no. 164. Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):2076-80.
• COE (COUNCIL OF EUROPE). Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research. Reference CETS No.195. [online] https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168008371a (ultimo accesso 25/01/2005)
• Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana.Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 27 dicembre 1948; 298.
• CNB (COMITATO NAZIONALE DI BIOETICA), La sperimentazione clinica in pazienti adulti o minori che non sono in grado di dare il consenso informato in situazioni di urgenza, 28 settembre 2012. [online] http://bioetica.governo.it/it/documenti/pareri-e-risposte/la-sperimentazione-clinica-in-pazienti-adulti-o-minori-che-non-sono-in-grado-di-dare-il-consenso-informato-in-situazioni-di-urgenza/ (ultimo accesso 03/12/2018)
• World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory data. World Health Statistics 2016: Monitoring health for the SDGs. [online] https://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2016/en/(ultimo accesso 17/05/2017)
• WHO (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION) The European health report 2015 Targets and beyond – reaching new frontiers in evidence - Highlights - EHR_High_EN_WEB.pdf [online] http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/284750/EHR_High_EN_WEB.pdf?ua=1 (ultimo accesso 14/08/2015)
• Gräsner JT, Lefering R, Koster RW, et al. Corrigendum to “EuReCa ONE — 27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry A prospective one month analysis of out-of hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe†[Resuscitation 2016; 105: 188-195]. Resuscitation 2016;109: 145-6.
• Ong MEH, Perkins GD, Cariou A. Out of- hospital cardiac arrest: prehospital management. Lancet 2018 (391): 980-8.
• South Central Oxford C Research Ethics Committee, 2014. [online] https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/critical/paramedic2/documents/p2_ethics_app.pdf (ultimo accesso 08/09/2014)
• McCartney M. Adrenaline in cardiac arrest: it’s unethical for patients not to know. BMJ 2014;349:g5258
• Sirton R, Sirton L. Adrenaline, Information Provision and the Benefits of a Non-Randomised Methodology. Journal of Medical Ethics blog, 2014 [online] https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2014/08/17/adrenaline-information-provision-and-the-benefits-of-a-non-randomised-methodology/#more-2815 (ultimo accesso 17/08/2014)
• Wilkinson D. Please randomize me – but don’t tell my family that you did, Pratical Ethics blog, 2014, [online] http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/08/please-randomize-me-but-dont-tell-my-family-that-you-did/ (ultimo accesso 21/08/2014)
• WARWICK UNIVERSITY, The PARAMEDIC2 trial is looking at whether adrenaline is helpful or harmful in the treatment of a cardiac arrest that occurs outside a hospital. [online] https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/critical/paramedic2/
• WARWICK UNIVERSITY,Trial Resources for PARAMEDIC2 trial (The Adrenaline Trial). [online] https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/critical/paramedic2/documents/paramedic2_protocol_v3_12-oct-2016.pdf (12/10/2016)
• South Central Oxford C Research Ethics Committee, 2014. [online] https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/critical/paramedic2/documents/p2_ethics_app.pdf (ultimo accesso 08/09/2014)
• Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al. Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(8):711-721
• WARWICK UNIVERSITY,Trial Resources for PARAMEDIC2 trial (The Adrenaline Trial). [online] https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/critical/paramedic2/documents/paramedic2_protocol_v3_12-oct-2016.pdf (12/10/2016)paragrafo 2.3.3Helth Economics p.14, paragrafo 6.3 Economic Evaluation p. 42
• WARWICK UNIVERSITY, Frequently Asked Questions (PARAMEDIC2 Trial) [online] https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/critical/paramedic2/faqs/
• Legge 22 dicembre 2017, n.219 Norme in materia di consenso informato e di disposizioni anticipate di trattamento. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana – Serie Generale 16gennaio 2018; 12.
Agenzie di supporto
Come citare
Giubbilo, I. (2019). Etica della ricerca in condizioni di urgenza. Domande etiche sulle conclusioni dello studio PARAMEDIC2. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 36(2), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2019.384
Aniarti ha scelto di applicare la Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione Non Commerciale 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY-NC 4.0) a tutti i manoscritti da pubblicare.