0
0
0
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

L’accesso intraosseo in emergenza/urgenza: revisione della letteratura

Authors

Introduzione: reperire un adeguato accesso vascolare in emergenza è spesso difficile. La via endovenosa è la prima scelta; nell’impossibilità di utilizzarla, l’accesso intraosseo è una potenziale alternativa. Questo articolo esplora tale possibilità.
Materiali e metodi: revisione narrativa condotta su Pubmed, Cinahl, Cochrane Library, Embase; valutazione di qualità degli articoli con checklist CONSORT e STROBE.
OTTOmANO M. L’accesso intraosseo. Una valida alternativa nel soccorso al traumatiz- zato. IRC trauma journal n. 5, aprile 2012. Disponibile all’indirizzo www.ircouncil. it/ les/documenti/Documenti_nuovi_2/TJCAnno%202_Numero%205.pdf, Ulti- mo accesso 31/08/2013.
WAyNE MA. Adult intraosseous vascular access in emergency medicine. Europe- an Critical Care & Emergency Medicine. 2009; 1:33-36.
QuINN lm, SHEIkH A. Establishing intrave- nous access in an emergency situation. Emerg Med J. 2012; 30:136-40.
DRINkER C, DRINkER k, luND C. The circulation in the mammalian bone marrow. Am J Physiol. 1922; 62:1-92.
DublICk mA, HOlCOmb Jb. A review of intra- osseous vascular access: current status and military application. Military Medi- cine. 2000; 165(7):552-9.
HEINIlD S, SONDERGAARD T,TuDvAD F. Bone marrow infusions in childhood: experience from a thousand infusions. J Pediatr. 1947; 30:400-411.
ENGlE WA. Pediatric IO Infusions: impact on vascular access time. Injury. 2003; 36:1039.
ROSETTI VA, THOmPSON bm, mIllER J et al. In- traosseous infusion: an alternative route of pediatric intravascular access. Ann Emerg Med. 1985; 14:885-8.
AmERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION. American Heart As- sociation guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovas- cular care: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation. 2005; 112: IV-167 – IV-187.
AmERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION. Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, 7.2: Man- agement of cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2005;112 (suppl. 1):IV-58-IV-66.
NOlAN JP, DEAkIN CD, SOAR J, bOTTIGER bW, SmITH G. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Sec- tion 4. Adult advanced life support. Re- suscitation. 2005; 67(suppl. 1):S39-86.
NOlAN JP, SOAR J, ZIDEmAN DA et al. Europe- an Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4 Adult ad- vanced life support. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:1219-1276.
AmERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION. 2010 Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circula- tion. 2010;122(18) Suppl. 3:S742, S881.
vON Elm E, AlTmAN DG, EGGER m. STROBE Sta- tement: linee guida per descrivere gli studi osservazionali. [Online] Oct-Nov 2007. www.strobe-statement.org/index. php?id=available-checklists. Ultimo ac- cesso 31/08/2013.
AlTmAN DG, SCHulZ kf, mOHER D. et al. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Report- ing Randomized Trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001; 134(1):663-694.
bRENNER T, bERNHARD m, HElm m et al. Com- parison of two intraosseous infusion sys- tems for adult emergency medical use. Resuscitation. 2008; 78:314-19.
READES R, STuDNEk J, GARRET J et al. Intra- osseous versus intravenous vascular ac- cess during out of hospital cardiac ar- rest: a randomized controlled trial. An- nals of Emergency Medicine. 2011; 58:509-16.
lEIDEl b, kIRCHOff C, bRAuNSTEIN V et al. Com- parison of two intraosseous access de- vices in adult patients under resuscita- tion in the emergency depertment: A pro- spective, randomized study. Resuscita- tion. 2010; 81:994-99.
SHAvIT I, HOffmANN y, GAlbRAITH R, WAISmAN Y. Comparison of two mechanical intra- osseous Infusion devices: A pilot, ran- domized crossover trial. Resuscitation 2009; 80:1029-33.
HOSkINS l, DO NASCImENTO P, lImA R, TENORIO J, kRAmER G. Pharmacokinetics of intraos- seous and central venous drug delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2012; 83:107-12.
lARAbEE m, CAmPbEll J, SEvERyN, lITTlE C. Intra- osseous infusion of ice cold saline is less ef cacious than intravenous infusion for induction of mild therapeutic hypother- mia in a swine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011; 82:603-06.
HARTHOlT k, lIESHOuT E, THIES W et al. Intraos- seous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devic- es. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2010; 14:6-13.
vON HOff D, PHARm J, mIllER l et al. Does intraosseous equal intravenous? A phar- macokinetic study. The American Journal of medicine 2008; 26:31-38.
TAN b, CHONG S, kOH Z et al. EZ-IO in the ED: an observational, prospective study com- paring ow rates with proximal and distal tibia intraosseous access in adults. The American journal of Emergency Medi- cine. 2012; 30:1602-06.
SuNDE G, HERADSTvEIT b, vIkENES b, HElTNE J. Emergency intraosseous access in a hel- icoprter emergency medical service: a retrospective study. Scandinavian Jour- nal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emer- gency Medicine. 2010; 18:52-57.
GAZIN N, AuGER H, JAbRE P et al. Ef cacy and safety of the EZ-IO intraosseous device: out of hospital implementation of a man- agement algorithm for dif cult vascular access. Resuscitation. 2010; 82:126-9.
ONG m, CHAN y, OH J et al. An observation- al, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using th EZ-IO. The American journal of emer- gency medicine 2009; 27:8-15.
ONG m, NGO A, WIJIAyA R. An observation- al, prospective study to determinate the ease of vascular access in adults using a novel intraosseous access device.Annals Academy of Medicine 2009; 38:121-4.
lEIDEl b, kIRCHOff C, bOGNER v et al. Com- parison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency depart- ment with inaccessible peripheral veins. Resuscitation. 2012; 83:40-45.
lEIDEl b, kIRCHOff C, bOGNER V et al. Is the intraosseous access route fast and ef - cacious compared to conventional cen- tral venous catheterization in adult pa- tients under resuscitation in the emer- gency department? A prospective obser- vational pilot study. Patient safety in sur- gery. 2009; 3:24-32.
SANTOS D, CARRON P, yERSIN b, PASQuIER m. EZ- IO intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: a prospective study and review of the liter- ature. Resuscitation. 2012; 84:440-445.
SCHAlk R, SCHWEIGkOflER u, lOTZ G et al. Ef- cacy of the EZ-IO needle driver for out of hospital intraosseous access: a pre- liminary,observational,multicenter study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resus- citation and Emergency Medicine. 2011; 19:65-70.
DAy mW. Intraosseous devices for intrava- scular access in adult trauma patients. Crit Care Nurse. 2011; 31(2);76-89.
STONE mb, TEISmANN NA, WANG R. Ultrasono- graphic con rmation of intraosseous ne- edle placement in an adult unembalmed cadaver model. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 4 9(4)515-9.

Supporting Agencies

How to Cite

Gallo, M., Lodini, R., Destrebecq, A., D’Antuono, A., & Terzoni, S. (2018). L’accesso intraosseo in emergenza/urgenza: revisione della letteratura. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 31(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2014.93