https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2015.62
Mobilizzazione del paziente con infarto miocardico acuto non complicato. Revisione sistematica della letteratura scientifica
Submitted: 18 January 2018
Accepted: 18 January 2018
Published: 18 January 2018
Accepted: 18 January 2018
Abstract Views: 444
PDF (Italiano): 882
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
HerKner H, arriCH J, Havel C, mùllner M. Co- chrane review. Bed rest for acute uncom- plicated myocardial infarction. The Co- chrane Library, Issue 2, 2007.
sCHiKs i,sCHoonHoven l,aenGevaeren W et al. Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective comparison of early vs. late ambulation. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008; 18: 1862-1870.
HerKnera H, tHoennissena J, niKFardJamb m et al. Short versus prolonged bed rest after uncomplicated acute myocardial infar- ction: A systematic review and meta-a- nalysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2003; 56: 775-781.
reddy bK, breWster Ps, WalsH t et al. Ran- domized Comparison of Rapid Ambula- tion Using Radial, 4 French Femoral Access, or Femoral Access With AngioSeal Closure. Catheterization and Cardiova- scular Interventions 2004; 62: 143-149.
auGustin aC, sCHaan de quadros a, sarmen- to-leite RE. Early sheath removal and am- bulation in patients submitted to percu- taneous coronary intervention: A rando- mized clinical trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010; 47: 939-945.
allen C, Glasziou P, del mar C. Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. The Lancet 1999; 354:1229-33.
Cortes ol, villar JC, devereaux PJ. Early mobilization for patients following acu- te myocardial infarction: A systematic re- view and meta-analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009; 46: 1496-1504.
de lima loPes J, bottura leite de barroy al. Ear- ly mobilization after myocardial infarction: shower or bed bath? Rev. Latino-Am. En- fermagem 2010; 18 (2):217-233.
taylor rs, broWn a, ebraHim s et al. Exerci- se-Based Rehabilitation for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Re- view and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The American Journal Of Medicine May 2004; 116: 682-692.
boldini P, amato A. Ef cacia dei ltri/umidi - catori passivi, versus ltri/umidi catori ri- scaldati connessi ai respiratori meccani- ci nei pazienti adulti intubati. Scenario 2005; 22(3):13-19.
Casp Checklists. Ultimo accesso 20/03/2014. Disponibile presso: http:// www.casp-uk.net/#!casp-tools-checkli- sts/c18f8
Scheda per la valutazione degli stu- di di trattamento. Ultimo accesso il 20/03/2014.Disponibile presso: http:// www.evidencebasednursing.it/calcolato- ri/griglie_EBN.htm
Handbook EBP. Ultimo accesso 20/03/2014. Disponibile presso: http://
www.evidencebasednursing.it/secretro-
om/HANDBOOK_EBP.pdf
Ward sr, Casale P, raymond r et al. Ef cacy
and Safety of a Hemostatic Puncture Clo- sure Device With Early Ambulation After Coronary Angiography. American Jour- nal of Cardiology 1998; 81:569-572.
rezaei-adarvani m, aHmadi F, asqHari-JaFaraba- di M. The effect of changing position and early ambulation after cardiac cathe- terization on patients’ outcomes: A sin- gle-blind randomized controlled trial. In- ternational Journal of Nursing Studies 2009; 46: 1047-1053.
HoGlund J, stenestrand u, todt t, JoHansson
I. The effect of early mobilization for pa- tient undergoing coronary angiography; A pilot study with focus on vascular com- plications and back pain. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2011; 10: 130-136.
Cronqvist a, FaaGer G, larsen FF, sCHenCK-Gu- staFsson K. Stepwise versus symptom-li- mited in-hospital mobilization after acu- te myocardial infarction. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1996; 12: 67-75.
KeelinG a, taylor v, nordt la, PoWers e, Fi- sHer C. Reducing Time in Bed after Car- diac Catheterization (TIBS II). American Journal of Critical Care July 1996; 5 (4): 277-281.
WalKer s, Jen C, mCCosKer F et al. Compa- rison of Complications in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Mobilized at 3, 4, and 6 Hours After Femoral Arte- rial Sheath Removal. Journal of Cardio- vascular Nursing 2008; 23 (5): 407-413.
FoWloW b, PriCe P, FunG T. Ambulation after sheat removal: a comparison of 6 and 8 hours of bed rest after sheat removal in patients following a PTCA procedure. Heart and Lung Jan/Feb 1995; 24 (1): 28-37.
dunstan Jl, riddle lm. Rapid recovery ma- nagement: the effects on the patient who has undergone heart surgery. Heart and Lung jul/aug 1997; 26 (4): 289-298.
KoCH tK, PieK JJ, de Winter rJ et al. Two hour ambulation after coronary angio- plasty and stenting with 6 F guiding ca- theters and low dose heparin. Heart 1999; 81: 53-56.
rosenstein G, CaFri C, Weinstein JM et al. Simple Clinical Risk Strati cation and the Safety of Ambulation Two Hours After 6 French Diagnostic Heart Cateterization. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology 2004; 16: 126-128.
CroCKer CH, CraGun Kt, timimi FK et al. Im- mediate Ambulation Following Diagno- stic Coronary Angiography Procedures Utilizing a Vascular Closure Device (The Closer). The Journal of Invasive Cardiolo- gy Dec 2002; 14 (12): 728-732.
taGney J, laCKie D. Bed-rest post-femoral arterial sheath removal – What is safe practice? A clinical audit. British Asso- ciation of Critical Care Nurses, Nursing in Critical Care 2005; 10 (4): 167-173.
rezaei-adarvani m, aHmadi F, asqHari-JaFaraba- di M. The effect of three position methods on patient outcomes after cardiac cathe- terization. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2009; 65(2): 417-24.
Pollard sd, munKs K, Wales C et al. Position and Mobilisation Post Angiography Stu- dy (PAMPAS): a comparison of 4.5 hours and 2.5 hours bed rest. Heart 2003;89: 447-8.
neWby K, eisenstein el, CaliFF rm et al. Cost Effectiveness of early discharge after uncomplicated acute myocardial infar- ction. The New England Journal of Medi- cine 2000; 342 (11): 749-755.
Supporting Agencies
How to Cite
Franchi, C., Nykieforuk, S., Aprigliano, N. F., De Padova, G., Lucarelli, D. L., & Pontrandolfo, S. (2018). Mobilizzazione del paziente con infarto miocardico acuto non complicato. Revisione sistematica della letteratura scientifica. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 32(4), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2015.62
Aniarti has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.