https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2022.515
Project to validate an instrument for assessing the care complexity of the pediatric patient: the Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score
Submitted: 7 June 2022
Accepted: 7 June 2022
Published: 7 June 2022
Accepted: 7 June 2022
Abstract Views: 654
PDF (Italiano): 253
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
A quality health service, in addition to having high-level requirements and operating safely, must organize resources effectively by providing for the assignment of patients to the appropriate care setting and the reorganization of resources based on their needs. Classifying patients according to their needs can provide useful information for the organization and delivery of nursing care. In the pediatric setting, several tools for classifying patients do not meet all the methodological-scientific criteria to be considered reliable and valid, or are difficult to apply in practice. Therefore, a tool (Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score) was constructed to assess the complexity of pediatric nursing care required to meet needs, identified as core, of hospitalized children or adolescents and their families.
World Health Organization - Regional Office for Europe. Guidance on developing quality and safety strategies with a health system approach. Genève: World Health Organization; 2008.
Joint Commission International. Accreditation standards for hospitals - Sixth edition. Oak Brook (IL): Joint Commission International; 2017; 95.
Van Slyck A. Patient Classification Systems: not a proxy for nurse ‘busyness’. Nurs Adm Q. 2000;24(4):60-5.
Mongardi M, Bassi E, Di Ruscio E. Ospedale per intensità di cura: strumenti per la classificazione dei pazienti [PDF file]. 2015. Retrieved from: http://salute.regione.emilia-romagna.it/documentazione/rapporti/201cospedale-per-intensita-di-cura-strumenti-per-la-classificazione-dei-pazienti201d-febbraio-2015/view.
Morris R, Mac Neela P, Scott A, Treacy P, Hyde A. Reconsidering the conceptualization of nursing workload: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(5):463-71.
De Groot HA. Patient Classification System evaluation. Part 1: essential system elements. J Nurs Adm.1989;19(6):30-5.
Connor JA, LaGrasta C, Hickey PA. Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes tool for measuring pediatric critical care nursing. Am J Crit Care. 2015;24(4),297-308.
Connor JA, LaGrasta C, Gauvreau K, Porter C, Hickey PA. Validation of the Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (CAMEO II) acuity tool for pediatric critical care nursing. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019;38,153-9.
Connor JA, LaGrasta C, Porter C, Hurtig M, King E, Atkinson A, Hickey PA. The measurement of pediatric inpatient nursing using the Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (CAMEO©) tool. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020;51,42-8.
Mikkelsen G & Frederiksen K. Family Centred Care of children in hospital, a concept analysis.
J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(5):1152-62.12.
Fagerström L, Rainio AK, Rahuala A, Nojonen K. Validation of a new method for patient classification, the OULU Patient Classification. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(2):481-90.
Richards DA & Borglin G. Complex interventions and nursing: looking through a new lens at nursing research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48, 531-3.
Henderson V. I principi fondamentali dell’assistenza infermieristica – Revisione 2004 (edizione italiana). Genève: International Council of Nursing; 2004.
Polit DF & Beck CT. The Content Validity Index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489-97.
Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-5.
Keeney S, McKenna H, Hasson F. The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Chichester (UK): Wiley and Blackwell, John Wiley and sons; 2007; 36-8.
Rayens MK. & Hahn, EJ. Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2000;1(4):308-15.
Bannigan K & Watson R. Reliability and validity in a nutshell. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(23):3237-43.
Morse JM. The safety of safety research: the case of patient fall research. Can J Nurs Res. 2006;38(2):73-88.
Seigel DG, Podgor MJ, Remaley NA. Acceptable values of kappa for comparison of two groups. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(5):571-8.
Tinsley HEA & Tinsley DJ. Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol. 1987;34:414-24.
DeVellis RF. Scale Development Theory and Applications – Fourth edition. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publishing; 2017; 147-200.
Supporting Agencies
How to Cite
Da Rin Della Mora, R., Calza, S., Subbrero, M., Tirone, R., Parodi, S., Pistorio, A., Calevo, M. G., Haupt, R., & Scelsi, S. (2022). Project to validate an instrument for assessing the care complexity of the pediatric patient: the <i>Gaslini Pediatric Nursing Score</i>. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 39(2), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2022.515
Aniarti has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.