https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2019.377
Complicanze legate alla modalità di somministrazione della Nutrizione Enterale: implicazioni cliniche nella pratica infermieristica. Revisione della letteratura
Ricevuto: 17 aprile 2019
Accettato: 17 aprile 2019
Pubblicato: 17 aprile 2019
Accettato: 17 aprile 2019
Abstract Views: 1323
PDF: 147
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
La Nutrizione Enterale (NE) è una tipologia di alimentazione artificiale comunemente usata nei pazienti critici ricoveratinelle Unità di Terapia Intensiva (UTI), in grado di garantire un’adeguata nutrizione e sostenere uno stato di salute ottimale, qualora sia andato perduto. La criticità del paziente porta ad un particolare assetto ormonale che determina un elevato catabolismo andando incontro al rischio di sviluppare malnutrizione calorica.
SINPE (Società Italiana di Nutrizione Artificiale e Metabolismo) Manuale di Nutrizione Artificiale Edizioni Guida 20072 pp. 189-190
Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M. Disease-related malnutrition: an evidence-based approach to treatment. CAB International 2003. ISBN:0851996485 DOI:10.1079/9780851996486.0000
McAtear CA, Arrowsmith H, McWhirter J, Payne –James J, Silk DBA, Stanford J, Teahon K (1999). Current perspectives of enteral Nutrition in adults. A report by the working party of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition group (BAPEN). Berkshire: BAPEN
Biffi R. Biolo G. Bozzetti F. et al. Manuale di Nutrizione Artificiale Edizioni Guida 20072 pp. 87-93
SIMPE Società Italiana di Nutrizione artificiale e Metabolismo: XVIII Congresso nazionale Milano 2017. Atti congressuali 1[12]; 41-44
Taylor, Beth E. RD, DCN, McClave et al. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). Critical Care Medicine: February 2016; 44 (2): 390–438
Rhoney DH, Parker D Jr, Formea CM, Yap C, Coplin WM. Tolerability of bolus versus continuous gastric feeding in brain-injured patients. Neurol Res. 2002 Sep;24(6):613-20.
Serpa LF, Kimura M, Faintuch J, Ceconello I. Effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition in critical patients. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003 Jan-Feb;58(1):9-14.
Kadamani I, Itani M, Zahran E, Taha N. Incidence of aspiration and gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients using continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition: a pseudo-randomised controlled trial. Aust Crit Care. 2014 Nov;27(4):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.12.001.
Mohsen Shahriari, Ehsaneh Rezaei, Leila Azad Bakht, Saeid Abbasi4. Comparison of the effects of enteral feeding through the bolus and continuous methods on blood sugar and prealbumin levels in ICU inpatients. J Edu Health Promot 2015, 4:95
David C Evans, Rachel Forbes, Christian Jones, Robert Cotterman, Chinedu Njoku, Cattleya Thongrong, David Tulman, Sergio D Bergese, Sheela Thomas, Thomas J Papadimos, Stanislaw P Stawicki. Continuous versus bolus tube feeds: Does the modality affect glycemic variability, tube feeding volume, caloric intake, or insulin utilization? Internetional Journal of Critical Illness & Injury Science. 2016; 6(1): 9-15
Steevens, E. C., Lipscomb, A. F., Poole, G. V. and Sacks, G. S. (2002), Comparison of Continuous vs Intermittent Nasogastric Enteral Feeding in Trauma Patients: Perceptions and Practice. Nutr Clin Pract, 17: 118-122. doi:10.1177/0115426502017002118
Chen YC, Chou SS, Lin LH, Wu LF. The effect of intermittent nasogastric feeding on preventing aspiration pneumonia in ventilated critically ill patients. J Nurs Res. 2006 Sep;14(3):167-80.
MacLeod JB, Lefton J, Houghton D, Roland C, Doherty J, Cohn SM, Barquist ES. Prospective randomized control trial of intermittent versus continuous gastric feeds for critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007 Jul;63(1):57-61.
Indubala Maurya, Mridula Pawar, Rakesh Garg, Mohandeep Kaur, and Rajesh Sood. Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Apr-Jun; 5(2): 195–201.
Nasiri M, Farsi Z, Ahangari M, Dadgari F. Comparison of Intermittent and Bolus Enteral Feeding Methods on Enteral Feeding Intolerance of Patients with Sepsis: A Triple-blind Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units Middle East J Dig Dis. 2017 Oct;9(4):218-227. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.77.
Pierre Singer, Annika Reintam Blaser, Mette M. Berger, Waleed Alhazzani, Philip C. Calder, Michael P. Casaer, Michael Hiesmayr, Konstantin Mayer, Juan Carlos Montejo, Claude Pichard, Jean-Charles Preiser, Arthur R.H. van Zanten, Simon Oczkowski, Wojciech Szczeklik, Stephan C. Bischoff. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037
McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, McCarthy MS, Davanos E, Rice TW, Cresci GA, Gervasio JM, Sacchi GS, Roberts PR, Compher C; Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Linee guida per la fornitura e la valutazione della terapia di supporto nutrizionale nei pazienti adulti gravemente malati: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) e American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Feb; 40 (2): 159-211. doi: 10.1177 / 0148607115621863.
Bankhead R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J, Lyman B, Metheny NA, Mueller C, Robbins S, Wessel J and, (2009), A.S.P.E.N. Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 33: 122-167. doi:10.1177/0148607108330314
Agenzie di supporto
Come citare
Buscemi, M., D’ambrosio, F., & Rosati, M. (2019). Complicanze legate alla modalità di somministrazione della Nutrizione Enterale: implicazioni cliniche nella pratica infermieristica. Revisione della letteratura. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 36(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2019.377
Aniarti ha scelto di applicare la Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione Non Commerciale 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY-NC 4.0) a tutti i manoscritti da pubblicare.