Original Articles
Vol. 43 No. 3 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2026.682

Perceptions and use of the vacuum mattress in prehospital trauma care: a cross-sectional surve

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 31 August 2026
59
Views
44
Downloads
Emergency medical services, wounds and injuries, spinal injuries, immobilization, vacuum mattress

Authors

Lorenzo Galli
Registered Nurse, Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, Auxilium Vitae Volterra S.p.A., Volterra, Italy.
Leonardo Ceccanti
Clinical Tutor, Bachelor’s Degree Program inNursing, University of Florence, Empoli Campus, Italy.
Ilario Bocchi
Prehospital Emergency Medical Service (EMS 118), Empoli, USAR Team, Tuscany Region, Italy.
Flavio Gheri
gheri.flavio@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7749-6071
Prehospital Emergency Medical Service (EMS 118), Empoli; PhD Candidate in Nursing and Public Health Sciences,University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Introduction: spinal immobilization has traditionally been considered a key component of prehospital trauma care to prevent secondary spinal cord injury. However, growing evidence has questioned the routine use of rigid immobilization such as spine board, highlighting potential complications and limited clinical benefit. In response, the concept of spinal motion restriction has been introduced, promoting more selective approaches to spinal stabilization. Despite evolving recommendations, variability in clinical practice persists, and the perceptions and decision-making processes of prehospital providers regarding immobilization devices remain poorly explored.

Materials and Methods: a cross-sectional observational survey was conducted among prehospital healthcare professionals operating within the emergency medical services system of Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy. A structured questionnaire consisting of 15 multiple-choice items was developed to assess knowledge, perceptions, and reported practices regarding the use of spinal immobilization devices, with particular focus on the vacuum mattress. Responses were collected anonymously through an online survey platform and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: a total of 86 prehospital professionals participated in the survey, including nurses (22.1%) and advanced rescuers (77.9%). While the vacuum mattress was perceived by 74.4% of respondents as the most effective immobilization device, the spine board was considered the fastest device by 82.6%. Despite this perceived effectiveness, the vacuum mattress appeared to be rarely used in clinical practice, with 94.2% of participants reporting fewer than five uses per year.

Conclusions: a discrepancy exists between participants' perceived effectiveness and the actual use of spinal immobilization devices in prehospital trauma care. Operational factors such as application speed, provider familiarity, and logistical considerations may influence device selection. Improving training and aligning clinical practice with evolving SMR recommendations may support more consistent and evidence-informed trauma care.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
1. Jam MB, Shahrestanaki YA, Arjeini Z, Alipour R. Evaluating the effect of a scenario-based pre-hospital trauma management training course on the knowledge and clinical skills of emergency medical service students. BMC Emerg Med 2025;25:30.
2. eyal y, tsur n, gendler s, et al. spinal Backboard—Necessity or Hazard? The IDF clinical practice guidelines and policy. Military Med 2023;188:e1781–7.
3. Gheri F, Toppi N, Bortoli N, et al. Prehospital spinal and cervical motor restriction in adult trauma patients: a narrative review. Emerg Care J 2025;21:14088.
4. Fischer PE, Perina DG, Delbridge TR, et al. Spinal motion restriction in the trauma patient–a joint position statement. Prehospital Emerg Care 2018;22:659–61.
5. Nolte PC, Uzun DD, Häske D, et al. Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021;47:719–26.
6. Roessler M, Riffelmann M, Kunze-Szikszay N, et al. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2021;29:46.
7. Stuby L, Thurre D. Time performance of scoop stretcher versus vacuum mattress for prehospital spinal stabilization: open-label simulation-based randomized controlled trial. Emerg Care 2024;20:12226.
8. Ellis J, Courson R, Daniels B. Spinal trauma. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2014;7:381–6.
9. Feld FX. Removal of the long spine board from clinical practice: a historical perspective. J Athletic Training 2018;53:752–5.
10. McDonald N, Kriellaars D, Pryce RT. Patterns of change in prehospital spinal motion restriction: A retrospective database review. Acad Emerg Med 2023;30:698–708.
11. Castro-Marin F, Gaither JB, Rice AD, et al. Prehospital protocols reducing long spinal board use are not associated with a change in incidence of spinal cord injury. Prehosp Emerg Care 2020;24:401–10.
12. Righi L, Dell’Anno A, Trapassi S. L’utilizzo dell’immobilizzazione spinale in ambito extraospedaliero è ancora il presidio più efficace per la sicurezza del paziente? Un’analisi narrativa della letteratura. Scenario 2024;41:583.
13. Hauswald M. Prehospital spinal care: It is time to reconsider and revise. Academic Emergency Medicine 2021;28:14293.
14. Morrissey JF, Kusel ER, Sporer KA. Spinal motion restriction: an educational and implementation program to redefine prehospital spinal assessment and care. Prehosp Emerge Care 2014;18:429–32.
15. Wampler DA, Pineda C, Polk J, et al. The long spine board does not reduce lateral motion during transport—a randomized healthy volunteer crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:717–21.
16. Mahshidfar B, Mofidi M, Yari AR, Mehrsorosh S. Long Backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial. Prehosp Disaster Med 2013;28:462–5.

How to Cite



Perceptions and use of the vacuum mattress in prehospital trauma care: a cross-sectional surve. (2026). Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2026.682
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.