https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2016.50

Le best practices per la gestione della sepsi e dello shock settico in ambito intensivo: indagine conoscitiva multicentrica sull’aderenza alle raccomandazioni delle linee guida

V. 33 N. 3 (2016): Scenario 3 2016
Ricevuto: 17 gennaio 2018
Accettato: 17 gennaio 2018
Pubblicato: 17 gennaio 2018
Abstract Views: 422
PDF: 110
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Autori

Elena Algeri
webmaster@aniarti.it
Valeria Baffè
Laura Boarini
Guglielmo Imbrìaco
Introduzione: la sepsi è una risposta infiammatoria sistemica conseguente a un processo infettivo. Lo shock settico, diretta complicanza, è caratterizzato da ipoperfusione tissutale a cui si associa il danno funzionale di uno o più organi.
Obiettivo: l’obiettivo di questa indagine conoscitiva è di esplorare il livello di conoscenza degli infermieri di Terapia Intensiva in materia di sepsi e di shock settico.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
dellinGer rp, leVy mm, carlet Jm, Bion J, parKer mm, JaeschKe r et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2012. Crit. Care Med. 2013 Feb; 41(2):580-637.
leVer a, macKenzie i. Sepsis: de nition, epidemiology, and diagnosis. BMJ 2007; 335: 879-83.
GaiesKy df, edwards m, Kallan mJ, carr BJ. Benchmarking the Incidence and Mortality of Severe Sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74.
zhoUJ,Qianc,zhaom,yUX,KanGy,maXet al. Epidemiology and Outcome of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Intensive Care Units in Mainland China. PLoS ONE 9(9) 2014: e107181.
QUenot Jp, BinQUet c, Kara f, martinet o, Ganster f, naVelloU Jc et al. The epidemiology of septic shock in French intensive care units: the prospective multicenter cohort EPISS study. Critical Care 2013 17:R65.
steVenson eK, rUBenstein ar, radin Jt, weiner rs, walKey aJ. Two Decades of MortaliSty Trends among Patients with Severe Sepsis: a comparative meta-analisys. Crit Care Med. 2014 March; 42(3): 625–631.
parK dV, chUn Bc, Kim Jm, sohn JV, pecK Kr, Kim y et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of community- acquired Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: a Prospective Observational Study in 12 University Hospitals in Korea. J Korean
Med Sci 2012; 27: 1308-1314.
anGUs dc, linde-zwirBle wt, lidicKer J, clermont
G, carcillo J, pinsKy mr. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1303-10.
palese a, Battisti p, Garlatti i, scarparo c. La prevenzione della contaminazione delle emocolture. Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca, 2010, 29 (3) 192-97.
Kleinpell r, aitKen l, schorr ca. Implications of the New International Sepsis Guidelines for Nursing Care. Am J Crit Care, 2013; 22:212-222.
KoJic d, sieGler Bh, Uhle f, lichtenstern c, nawroth pp, weiGand ma et al. Are there new approaches for diagnosis, therapy guidance and outcome prediction of sepsis? World J Exp Med 2015 May 20; 5(2):50-63.
parK wB, myUnG sJ, oh md, lee J, Kim nJ, Kim ec et al. Educational intervention as an effective step for reducing blood culture contamination: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Hospital Infection 91 (2015) 111:116.
snyder sr, faVoretto am, Beatz ra, derzon Jh, madison Bm, mass d et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture. Contamination: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem. 2012 September; 45(0): 999–1011.
thUler lc, JeniceK m, tUrGeon Jp, riVard m, leBel p, leBel mh. Impact of a false positive blood culture result on the management of febrile children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997; 16:846–51.
sKafazand s, weinacKer aB. Blood cultures in the critical care unit. Improving utilization and yield. Chest 2002; 122: 1727-36.
Gander rm, Byrd l, de crescenzo m, hirany s, Bowen m, BaUGhman J. Impact of blood cultures drawn by phlebotomy on contamination rates and health care costs in a hospital emergency department. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 1021 e 1024.
alahmadi ym, aldeyaB ma, mcelnay Jc,
scott mJ, darwish elhaJJi fV, maGee fa et al. Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect, 2011; 77: 233e236.
ramirez p, Gordon m, cortes c, Villareal e, perez Belles c, roBles c et al. Blood culture contamination rate in an intensive care setting: Effectiveness of an education- based intervention. American Journal of Infection Control 43 (2015) 844-7.
alahmadi ym, mcelnay Jc, Kearney mp, aldeyaB ma, maGee fa, hanley J et al. Tackling the problem of blood culture contamination in the intensive care unit using an educational intervention. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:1964-71.
prKno a, wacKer c, BrUnKhorst fm, schlattmann p. Procalcitonin-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients with severe sepsis and septic shock – a systematic reviewand meta-analysis. Critical Care 2013 17:R291.
delaney mm, friedman mi, dolansKy ma, fitzpatricK JJ. Impact of a Sepsis Educational Program on Nurse Competence. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing; April 2015. Vol 46:Issue 4:179-186
ferrer r, artiGas a, leVy mm, Blanco J, Gonzalez-diaz G, Garnacho J. Multicenter Severe Sepsis Educational Program in Spain for the Edusepsis Study Group. JAMA. 2008 May 21; 299 (19):2294-303.
Girardis m, rinaldi l, donno l, marietta m, codelUppi m, marcheGiano p et al. Effects on management and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit after implementation of a sepsis program: a pilot study. Critical Care. October 2009, 13: R143.
leVy mm, rhodes a, phillips Gs, townsend sr, schorr ca, Beale r et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5 year study. Intensive care med. November 2014, vol. 40, issue 11, pp1623-33.
leVy mm, dellinGer rp, townsend sr, linde- zwirBle wt, marshall Jc, Bion J et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb; 36(2):222-31.doi: 10.1007/ s00134-009-1738-3. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

Agenzie di supporto

Come citare

Algeri, E., Baffè, V., Boarini, L., & Imbrìaco, G. (2018). Le best practices per la gestione della sepsi e dello shock settico in ambito intensivo: indagine conoscitiva multicentrica sull’aderenza alle raccomandazioni delle linee guida. Scenario® - Il Nursing Nella Sopravvivenza, 33(3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.4081/scenario.2016.50

Aniarti ha scelto di applicare la Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione Non Commerciale 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY-NC 4.0) a tutti i manoscritti da pubblicare.